| Newer Post | home | Older Post |
 |
 |
Home Inspection Contingency Modifications |
|
 In this competitive real estate market -- when buyers are often finding themselves competing with multiple other buyers for their perfect home -- some buyers find themselves considering whether to make an offer without a home inspection contingency. Certainly, an offer without a home inspection contingency is likely to be seen by the seller as a stronger than an identical offer with an inspection contingency. Of late, I have seen some buyers (or their agents) trying to find space between having a home inspection contingency and not having one. Here are three modifications of home inspection contingencies I have seen lately that don't seem to be all that helpful... Repairs Will Only Be Requested If Total Repair Cost Exceeds $1,000 - I suppose this is intended to communicate that a buyer won't ask the seller to make small or minor repairs, but most sellers still see this as being almost identical to a regular old home inspection contingency. After all, just about every inspection report has enough needed small repairs that they would have a total cost of over $1,000. So, this ends up being some "feel good language" that doesn't actually make an insightful seller feel any better than a contingency without the language. Inspection For Informational Purposes Only - This is usually accompanied by language that allows a buyer to terminate the contract if they do not like what they find during the home inspection, so this modification really just seems to be a promise to terminate the contract instead of asking for repairs if there are issues. This often isn't seen as much stronger than an offer with a regular old home inspection contingency. If There Are Issues, Buyer Will Request Repairs, Not Terminate - Again, I think this is often intended to try to make the seller feel better about the inspection contingency. The buyer is promising not to just give up and walk away -- they will at least request repairs and try to work things out. But, this one is also pretty subjective -- those repairs that are requested (instead of terminating the contract) can be requested in a manner that would make it almost impossible to come to an mutually acceptable resolution -- essentially working a buyer back towards being able to get out of the contract, technically by having required repairs instead of having terminated the contract. I have nothing against a buyer (or buyer's agent) trying to soften the impact of a home inspection contingency -- but most sellers look at things in a bit more of a black and white perspective -- is there an inspection contingency or not? So... instead of spending lots of time and energy trying to fine tune the language of a cleverly crafted modification of an inspection contingency... focus on deciding whether you want the opportunity to reconsider whether you will purchase the property after having gathered additional information during a home inspection. If you do want the chance to reconsider the purchase, then you're going to have an inspection contingency - and regardless of what additional language you add in to try to soften the impact of that contingency - a seller is almost certainly going to see it as being less favorable than an offer without an inspection contingency. Recent Articles:
| |
 |
 |
| Newer Post | home | Older Post |
Scott Rogers
Funkhouser Real
Estate Group
540-578-0102
scott@funkhousergroup.com
Licensed in the
Commonwealth of Virginia
Home Search
Housing Market Report
Harrisonburg Townhouses
Walk Through This Home
Investment Properties
Harrisonburg Foreclosures
Property Transfers
New Listings
